|
Over here are more examples of
pictures that have failed to make it to the final editing process for the two main
columns. The first was a test shot of the Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM. Although it
had demonstrated the degree of camera shake properly, the subject matter leaves a
lot to be desired. The two mini-balconies against a very distracting background of
an uncompleted building is another one of those that didn't make the grade. What
was I trying to show, anyway if this picture had been selected?
The "Nestle" branding
steals the attention away from the crowd. The idea was intended to show the crowd
rather than the booth but I wasn't really thinking when this picture was captured,
hence the weak result. The final shot from the batch above, was shot mainly to show
the difference between a daylight-balanced film and a tungsten-balanced type. This
picture on its own merit, is questionable - like what the main subject should have
been if it was not about film or lighting.
Below are two more examples shot with the EF 24-85mm zoom lens. The first shows a
construction site in the heart of Kuala Lumpur (which has since been completed),
shot at the lens' 24mm angle while the second picture was zoomed to its 35mm position
and shot in the vertical format. These angles may be acceptable to both the beginners
and amateurs but they didn't make the cut as far as I was concerned then. But they
are perfect for this issue's focus.
|
 |
Shot at 24mm |
|
 |
Shot at 35mm |
|
|
 |
Distracting elements |
|
 |
Simplified it |
|
For the two pictures of the atmosphere
at Canon's Prima booth, the first one has some distractions. While it might have
shown the crowd visiting the trade show, the main focus were to have been on the
promoter and the other visitor. The other shot had rectified the error. Over the
next two pages, I will be showing more examples of pictures that have been recorded
wrongly as well as the good ones that have their mistakes corrected.
Since this column deals mainly with photography techniques using the Canon way with
EOS cameras and EF lenses (where appropriate), among the aspects for me to consider
are do the pictures used to illustrate the accompanying articles have to be of a
certain standard and must they be not too complicated or too excellent for the taste
of most beginners and amateurs following this column. That's the reason why some
of the pictures shown were not exactly too breathtaking although they were above
average.
<<
Back to Main . 1 . 2
. 3 . 4
. 5 . 6
.
|