|
Versatility: Prime Lenses vs Zooms.
Of course, the EF 20mm f/2.8 USM
was slightly better even though the zoom lens was able to match the close-up capability
by having the focal length switched over to 35mm instead of 20mm with the same closest
focusing distance remaining unchanged. Still, the image size of the zoom lens at
35mm was not as close as the one shot by the EF 20mm lens at its closest focusing
distance.
This proved that the zoom lens is indeed more versatile than the prime lens but the
latter can be still be used for situations where narrower angle-of-view is needed
by just moving closer to the subject. In this second set of comparisons (below) between
the two EF lenses are photos of a bonsai plant in a large pot. The first photo was
shot with the EF 20mm Super wide-angle while the other three were captured by the
zoom lens. All four photos were shot at about the same distance.
|
 |
Shot by the EF 20mm |
|
|
|
EF 17-35L at 20mm |
|
| |
|
|
 |
EF 17-35L at 35mm |
|
|
|
EF 17-35L at 17mm |
|
As can be seen from the above, with the EF 20mm lens, I can get only one angle without
changing the distance of where I was standing. With the zoom lens, I can shoot the
plant at its 20mm, then zoom to the 35mm position and finally at its widest end,
at 17mm, all at the same distance. However, with the prime lens, a photographer can
be more creative as he/she can move forward and backward in order to determine the
best camera angle.
Okay, now look at this situation: Suppose you are using only prime lenses and happen
to be on a vacation and only have a 20mm Super wide-angle and the next focal length
available is either an 85mm or 100mm telephoto lens, which is too narrow to capture
the shots you have in mind, especially for a scene of the National Monument area
below.
|
 |
EF 20mm at 0.3m distance |
|
|
|
EF 20mm at 0.25m distance |
|
| |
|
|
 |
EF 17-35L at 20mm setting |
|
|
|
EF 17-35L at 35mm setting |
|
The pool is about three feet deep and as a tourist, getting wet from the waist down
in order to get a tighter shot of this scene will be out of the question. At best,
you can only shift the 20mm lens to get a slightly different angle of the monument
as pictured in photo No: 2. With the EF 17-35L zoom lens, not only can you get a
shot of the pool and the fountain at the 20mm (No: 3) setting but a closer view as
well when it is zoomed to the 35mm position (No: 4). This is one aspect where the
prime lens is less versatile than the zoom if an intermediate focal length of between
35mm and 50mm is not available at one's disposal for situations like the above.
<<
Back to Main . 1 . 2
. 3 . 4
. 5 . |
| |
|